I’m writing to express my concern about the recent policy change in Maryland that increases the minimum age for historic vehicle tags from 20 years to 26+ years (1999 and older). While I recognize that the intention may be to curb misuse of these tags, this change has real and unnecessary consequences for genuine vehicle collectors like myself.
I currently own a 2003 Chevrolet Silverado that is legally registered with historic tags. It is not a daily driver—it is part of a personal, privately-owned vehicle collection (consisting of 14 cars) that includes numerous classic and vintage vehicles of varying ages. I store these vehicles indoors, maintain them meticulously, and use them only for special occasions, car shows, cruise events, and personal enjoyment. They are not used for commuting, errands, or regular transportation.
With the new rule taking effect, I will be forced to have this Silverado undergo an inspection, emissions testing, and pay increased registration fees next year—all for a vehicle that continues to serve the same limited-use, collector purpose it always has. The only thing that has changed is the policy, not my usage or intent.
I understand that some people may have abused the historic plate system by using older vehicles as daily drivers to avoid emissions and inspection requirements. However, punishing genuine collectors due to the actions of a few is not an equitable solution. A one-size-fits-all rule disproportionately impacts responsible hobbyists, collectors, and preservationists who are preserving automotive heritage, not gaming the system.
There must be a more balanced approach. For example, if an owner can provide:
- Proof of multiple registered vehicles,
- A limited annual mileage report or insurance coverage consistent with collector use,
- Garage or indoor storage,
- Or evidence of participation in car shows and enthusiast events,
…then the state could offer a path to retain historic registration for vehicles that are between 20 and 25 years old. Many other states have similar tiered systems or exemptions for verified collectors, and I believe Maryland should consider something comparable.
The cost burden and bureaucratic hassle this change imposes—especially for those of us with large collections—is significant. The unintended consequence may be that Maryland sees fewer historic vehicles on the road at local events, shows, and parades, or that collectors will move their collections (and tax dollars) to other states with more reasonable policies.
Please reconsider this approach or at least allow for exemptions for verified collectors. I’d be happy to participate in further discussions or offer insight into how this change affects the collector car community, but Maryland never bothers to ask authentic collectors. It appears that someone behind an Excel spreadsheet has made the decision.
Sincerely,
Jason Miller
